Comparison between experimentation and multiphysics modelling to identify priority contradiction
Editor: Kevin Otto, Boris Eisenbart, Claudia Eckert, Benoit Eynard, Dieter Krause, Josef Oehmen, Nad
Author: Dubois, Sebastien (1,2); Chibane, Hicham (1,2); De Guio, Roland (1,2)
Institution: 1: INSA Strasbourg; 2: Icube, CSIP
Section: Design Methods
DOI number: https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2023.102
The contradictions of TRIZ are now widespread and recognized as an effective inventive design tool. They make it possible to find solution concepts to problems that cannot be solved by optimization approaches. However, many contradictions could be formulated and it could be difficult to choose the priority one. The authors propose here two methods to formulate the contradictions and identify the priority contradiction: an experimental approach on the one hand, and a multiphysics approach on the other hand. This analysis, illustrated through an example of 3D printing of parts, shows that these two approaches are similar in terms of result, and indeed make it possible to formulate contradictions taking into account all the complexity of a system.